Marvin Netuschil vs Stephan Fransen Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W W L W L
Form
W W L L W L L L W LHead-To-Head: Netuschil 1 - 0 Fransen
They have played 2 sets in total, with Netuschil winning 2 and Fransen winning 0. The last match between Netuschil and Fransen was at the Scheveningen Challenger, 14-07-2018, Q1 round, Clay with Marvin Netuschil getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Marvin Netuschil | 1 |
| Stephan Fransen | 0 |
Scheveningen Challenger(14-07-2018)
6
4
6
4
| Netuschil | Stats | Fransen |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 857 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 306 | Highest Rank | 744 |
| 33 | Age | 36 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 10 | Titles | 0 |
| 58% (257-183) | Career Total W/L | 40% (87-128) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Cirstea VS Baptiste PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Bergs VS Nishioka PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Marvin Netuschil
Player
Stephan Fransen
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
49%
(
32 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 8 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:25:23 | Average Match Time | 1:25:23 |
| 75% (49/65) | 1st Serve % | 61% (39/64) |
| 51% (25/49) | 1st Serve Win % | 46% (18/39) |
| 50% (8/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (9/25) |
| 58% (7/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (5/12) |
| 58% (37/64) | Return Points Win % | 49% (32/65) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Marvin Netuschil Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-3 2-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Peter Heller
Player
Marvin Netuschil
50%
(
14 of
28)
1st Serve %
55%
(
16 of
29)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
9
79%
(
11 of
14)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
39%
(
11 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
34
Total Points Won
23
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marvin Netuschil
Player
Justin Engel
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-7(6) 6-3 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Christoph Negritu
Player
Marvin Netuschil
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
8
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marvin Netuschil
Player
Lilian Marmousez
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
1
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
0
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Marvin Netuschil
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marvin Netuschil
Player
Alen Moritz Hodzic
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stephan Fransen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Justin Butsch
Player
Stephan Fransen
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stephan Fransen
Player
Roland Stuurman
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
10 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-0 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philipp Schroll
Player
Stephan Fransen
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marvin Netuschil
Player
Stephan Fransen
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
49%
(
32 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Stephan Fransen
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
96%
(
25 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stephan Fransen
Player
Adam Jones
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denys Klok
Player
Stephan Fransen
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clement Geens
Player
Stephan Fransen
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stephan Fransen
Player
Marc Giner
59%
(
60 of
102)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
93)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
103
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(4) 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stephan Fransen
Player
Dax Donders
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (257/183) | Win/Loss | 40% (87/128) |
| 57% (572/427) | Sets Win/Loss | 42% (198/275) |
| 53% (4928/4385) | Games Win/Loss | 48% (2051/2246) |
| 46% (22/26) | Hard Win/Loss | 46% (12/14) |
| 63% (205/119) | Clay Win/Loss | 40% (74/109) |
| 44% (30/38) | Indoor Hard W/L | 25% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 461 | Aces Total | 179 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 658 | Total Double Faults | 249 |
| 1:2:2 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 570.39 | Average Opponent Rank | 452.16 |
| 66% (10878/16395) | 1st Serve % | 60% (2706/4513) |
| 65% (7058/10878) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (1791/2706) |
| 49% (2690/5517) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (841/1807) |
| 46% (922/1998) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (170/387) |
| 44% (7428/16890) | Return Points Win % | 38% (1676/4438) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (13/11) | Challenger W/L | 37% (23/40) |
| 59% (244/172) | Futures W/L | 43% (64/84) |
| 59% (256/437) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 40% (85/211) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 54% (62/114) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (24/52) |
| 52% (63/122) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (20/45) |
| 90% (248/222) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (92/76) |
| 10% (248/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (92/16) |
| 18% (192/35) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (123/11) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
